Miss Ana Piachuska
Journal Entries for Friends of Miss Ana Piachuska
© 1995-2008 URNotAlone.com, All Rights Reserved. All items © Copyright by their respective owners, used here with their consent.
Page generated in 0.09 seconds
URNotAlone
Accessibility Options
Testing 1-2-3-4-
Geena Beth White August 26th, 2008 7:56 pm MDTI have posted two entries within the past week, and they haven't shown up. This is a test for my third attempt.
[Comment on this post]
New Photos Soon
Geena Beth White August 26th, 2008 7:54 pm MDTWell... I finally got the nerve to post some photos of me dressed! Unfortunatly thye could be better. This afternoon, I played hookey from work and took some more photos that will hopefully be much better. I hope to get them posted before the weekend!
[Comment on this post]
I want to be more!
Geena Beth White August 24th, 2008 3:20 pm MDTAfter trying to hide my CD self for over 45 years, I want to give Geena more freedom! It's not going to happen overnight, and I am willing to proceed slowly, cautiously, towards becoming more than I am now. Fortunately my wife and soul mate of 35 years knows about my CD side, and although she doesn't embrace it, she at least understands why I do it, and that if anything, it has strengthened our marriage. Please know that even though I love to dress and become Geena for short periods, I do not want to permanently become her, as I am comfortable with my male self (most of the time anyway).
A currently have at last 24 very feminine outfits that range from dresses to skirt sets. I only love dresses and skirts when I dress, and only if they are between calf length and just below the knee. To go with these outfits, I have about 16 pair of shoes. The heels range from 2-1/2" to 4" and are of various styles and colors. As for lingeire, I have two dozen panties, 6 bras, combinatins of half and full slips, garters and several pair of gartered nylons (as well as thigh top). I hate pantyhose. My dresses and skirts are a size 16 and my shoes are a 9-1/2 (all USA sizes)
In the wig department, I hae two wigs, one long and one short, that closely match my real greay/white hair. Unfortunately, I don't have a great place to store them and when it comes to attempting to style them, I am all thumbs.
In the make-up department, I'm even worse. I did recently purchase some items from the Glamour Botique, and have some luck attepting to apply them, but again Im all thumbs. Hopefully with somw helpful suggestions from my new URNA gal friends, I can make some progress on this. Unfortunatemly, my wife currently doesn't want to be around when Geena is and I am too frightened of going to a botique that specializes in helping CD gals.
Additionally, I've got to take off about 15 to 20 pounds, to hopefully make my facial featues a little less full, and reduce my waist a coupld of inches (currently 25").
Well, this is where I am. I'm happy that I've made the decision to improve how Geena looks! I am also hoping that with this, Geena will grow more conficent in herself!
Huggers! --- Geena CD In MA
[Comment on this post]
Anyone in Bangor, Maine?
Rachel Williston April 21st, 2008 4:04 am MDTHi everyone! In my travels, I expect to be in Bangor, Maine in early May. Are there any girls who would like to meet, shop, photos, be friends ... ??? Let me know soon-ish, ok? Love from Rachel[Comment on this post]
What Makes a Pretty Face....?
T. R. Annie November 9th, 2007 7:56 am MSTWhat makes a pretty face? And why are we so powerfully attracted to feminine facial features? Consider the following associations: Big nose = ugly, small nose = pretty. Big eyes = pretty, small eyes = ugly. Looking at pictures of actresses and models, I’m fairly certain that the above rules are an accurate reflection of our facial preferences. Why? Rules may be rules, but I won't simply accept such things without looking at root causes. So here is my theory.It seems as if pretty women mimic the facial characteristics of human babies, who are also noted for their big eyes and small noses. The killer fact that proves this theory is found in the language used to describe nubile women. Is not an attractive woman called a “babe”? Is she not also described as “cute”, an adjective traditionally applied to babies or young furry animals? The use of these words is clear proof that, at some sub-conscious level, the human admirer realises he is behaving like an ass but is powerless to resist.Well, that’s my theory - what's yours?[1 comment]